PUBLICATIONS
Effects of IPR by mechanical oscillating strips system on biological structures: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation
Comparative study: Dentasonic IPR complete sequence (0.1 > 0.2 > 0.3 > 0.4 > polishing strip) vs Dentasonic IPR one strip only (0.2).
Conclusion: Qualitative SEM analysis showed a more regular enamel surfaces when teeth undergone the mechanical IPR protocol with respect to the use of a single metallic strip.
DOWNLOAD
VIEW
Friction and wear behavior of a mechanical oscillating strip system
This study aims to evaluate wear and friction properties of oscillating strips (Dentasonic’s) to validate the importance of a standardized interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) sequence to preserve their efficiency and lifetime.
Conclusion: The application of a standardized oscillating sequence allows for more efficient wear performance of the strips with a significant impact on their abrasive power and lifetime.
DOWNLOAD
VIEW
Couldn’t find what you are looking for?
Effects of IPR by mechanical oscillating strips system on biological structures: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation
Comparative study: Dentasonic IPR complete sequence (0.1 > 0.2 > 0.3 > 0.4 > polishing strip) vs Dentasonic IPR one strip only (0.2). Conclusion: Qualitative SEM analysis showed a more regular enamel surfaces when teeth undergone the mechanical IPR protocol with respect to the use of a single metallic strip.
Friction and wear behavior of a mechanical oscillating strip system
This study aims to evaluate wear and friction properties of oscillating strips (Dentasonic’s) to validate the importance of a standardized interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) sequence to preserve their efficiency and lifetime. Conclusion: The application of a standardized oscillating sequence allows for more efficient wear performance of the strips with a significant impact on their abrasive power and lifetime.